MI5 spy ‘launched campaign of terror against girlfriend’

0
46

Spy ‘used his status as an MI5 agent to launch long-term terror campaign against girlfriend he attacked with machete’ – then bosses launch legal action to hide his identity

  • Man suspected of using MI5 spy status to launch ‘terror’ on girlfriend
  • Agent ‘attacked her with machete and threatened to kill her’
  • A ban was enacted to keep secret human intelligence sources anonymous

An MI5 spy has reportedly used his identity to launch a long-running “terrorist” campaign against his girlfriend, which saw him attack her with a machete and threaten to kill her.

The ban remains in place to prevent the disclosure of any information that might identify the man, known only as “X,” who is said to be a secret source of human intelligence.

The BBC has been engaged in a legal battle with the government trying to prevent the release of the agent’s identity.

The company can now report evidence that the agent – a foreigner they say – was a violent “right-wing extremist” who hoarded Nazi paraphernalia and regularly terrorized his partners.

It also claimed in a video it played that the man could be seen threatening to kill a woman and attacking her with a machete.

An MI5 (HQ, Thames House, pictured) spy has reportedly used his identity to launch a long-running “terrorist” campaign against his girlfriend, seeing him attack her with a machete and threaten to kill her, according to reports

Attorney General Suella Braverman is seeking an injunction to block the BBC’s planned broadcast that would identify the man, arguing it would compromise national security and cause “serious or life-threatening real and immediate grievances against him”. Risk of injury”.

A High Court ruling on Wednesday said it would allow disclosure of details about the alleged abuse of two different women by the informant.

The foreigner moved abroad and continued his intelligence work after attacking the alleged victim with a machete and threatening to kill her, the BBC reported.

The incident was allegedly caught on camera, but the company said there were “serious problems” with the police response, including a failure to obtain a full statement or video from the woman.

The BBC said X was arrested and charged for the attack, but the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) allegedly dropped the case after going to court.

“He gave me so much psychological fear that it ended up breaking me because I was afraid of everything – because of the way he made me think, the people he was involved with, and the people he worked for,” the BBC quoted this as saying. the words of a lady.

‘He has complete control. I’m a shadow of who I am now,” she added. “At the end of a relationship, he decides every hour I’m awake – where I go, who I see, how I work, what I’m at work. What did I do, what did I wear. ”

Attorney General Suella Braverman seeks an injunction to block a planned broadcast that would identify the man, arguing it would compromise national security and cause “serious or life-threatening real and immediate harm to him” risk”

Police also allegedly found extremist material, including Nazi paraphernalia, at X’s home, but he later left the country.

The BBC said they had also located a separate woman in another country who also suffered at the hands of X.

The company said the story was “entirely in the public interest” and argued that women had a right to know his identity, which would protect potential victims from harm.

Justice Chamberlain had previously said the BBC could still air the programme and key issues, but could not be sure of X.

The ban remains in place to prevent companies from disclosing information that could identify the man, known only as “X,” who is said to be a secret human intelligence source (Chis).But the BBC said on Wednesday a High Court ruling (the court pictured) would allow it to reveal details of the alleged abuse of two different women by its informant

Lawyers representing Ms Braverman told a previous hearing she “neither confirm nor deny” the BBC’s claim that X was the agent, but rather approached the case on “hypothetical assumptions” he was or was.

After the ruling was announced on Wednesday, the BBC said: “This ruling allows us to tell a story that we believe is entirely in the public interest, and it justifies the BBC’s investigative journalism.”

A government spokesman said: “As a long-term policy, we do not comment on security or intelligence.

“As the judge in this case said, the temporary injunction granted by the government in April is designed to protect national security and avoid a real and immediate risk to life, safety and privacy.”

source: Read the full article

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here